SDEM vs. EMXF
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF).
SDEM and EMXF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SDEM is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend. It was launched on Mar 17, 2015. EMXF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Oct 6, 2020. Both SDEM and EMXF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SDEM vs. EMXF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SDEM vs. EMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 9.02% | 32.01% | 4.02% | 12.64% | -21.53% | 2.11% | 19.10% |
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.81% | 29.40% | 8.03% | 6.63% | -18.99% | 4.45% | 15.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 9.02% return, which is significantly higher than EMXF's 2.81% return.
SDEM
- 1D
- 2.83%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 9.02%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- 1Y
- 32.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.68%
EMXF
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -8.16%
- YTD
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 4.25%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SDEM vs. EMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXF's 0.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SDEM vs. EMXF — Risk / Return Rank
SDEM
EMXF
SDEM vs. EMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SDEM | EMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.15 | 1.61 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 2.19 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.31 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 2.38 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 9.33 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SDEM | EMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.61 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.20 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.36 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between SDEM and EMXF is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SDEM vs. EMXF - Dividend Comparison
SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than EMXF's 3.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF | 4.92% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 7.50% | 8.86% | 8.14% | 6.30% | 6.47% | 6.55% | 5.01% | 5.06% | 6.14% |
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 3.34% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SDEM vs. EMXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, which is greater than EMXF's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and EMXF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SDEM | EMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.38% | -33.13% | -14.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -12.53% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.72% | -32.89% | -3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.01% | -9.60% | +5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.99% | -12.34% | -8.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 3.19% | -0.80% |
Volatility
SDEM vs. EMXF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 7.05%, while iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a volatility of 9.71%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SDEM | EMXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.05% | 9.71% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 13.59% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.29% | 18.56% | -3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 21.82% | -4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 21.61% | -2.30% |