EMXF vs. VXUS
EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.15%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for VXUS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
EMXF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 14.25% return.
EMXF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 24.76%
- 6M
- 27.57%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 14.25%
- 6M
- 16.92%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
EMXF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 24.76% | 29.40% | 8.03% | 6.63% | -18.99% | 4.45% | 15.32% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.25% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXF and VXUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.79 |
The correlation between EMXF and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXF vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXF
VXUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMXF
VXUS
Financial Services
EMXF
VXUS
Communication Services
EMXF
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
EMXF
VXUS
Industrials
EMXF
VXUS
Healthcare
EMXF
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
EMXF
VXUS
Basic Materials
EMXF
VXUS
Real Estate
EMXF
VXUS
Utilities
EMXF
VXUS
Energy
EMXF
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
EMXF
VXUS
EMXF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 2.12 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.42 | 2.90 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 2.85 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 11.14 | +3.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.12 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.53 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.39 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
EMXF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -35.97% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -11.27% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.93% | -13.58% | -2.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -29.44% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.99% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -8.22% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.88% | +0.37% |
Volatility
EMXF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 5.60%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXF | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 5.60% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 13.00% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 15.21% | +3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 16.05% | +6.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 17.16% | +4.61% |
EMXF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMXF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.75% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXF and VXUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXF has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to VXUS (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 5-year performance, VXUS leads with 8.46% vs 7.15% for EMXF. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 8.46% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for EMXF.
EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
EMXF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.05% for VXUS.
EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXF and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer