EMXF vs. ESGE
EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - EMXF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index while ESGE tracks the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.15%/yr vs 6.83%/yr for ESGE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ESGE.
Performance
EMXF vs. ESGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly lower than ESGE's 26.85% return.
EMXF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 24.76%
- 6M
- 27.57%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 55.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXF vs. ESGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 24.76% | 29.40% | 8.03% | 6.63% | -18.99% | 4.45% | 15.32% |
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 26.85% | 35.86% | 6.63% | 9.51% | -22.41% | -2.87% | 13.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXF and ESGE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between EMXF and ESGE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
EMXF vs. ESGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EMXF
ESGE
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Technology
EMXF
ESGE
Financial Services
EMXF
ESGE
Communication Services
EMXF
ESGE
Consumer Cyclical
EMXF
ESGE
Industrials
EMXF
ESGE
Healthcare
EMXF
ESGE
Consumer Defensive
EMXF
ESGE
Basic Materials
EMXF
ESGE
Real Estate
EMXF
ESGE
Utilities
EMXF
ESGE
Energy
EMXF
ESGE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXF vs. ESGE — Risk / Return Rank
EMXF
ESGE
EMXF vs. ESGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EMXF | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.50 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 3.98 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.56 | 15.51 | -0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EMXF | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 2.75 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.36 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
EMXF vs. ESGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum ESGE drawdown of -41.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and ESGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXF | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -41.07% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -13.90% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.93% | -16.71% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -39.23% | +6.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.23% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.02% | -14.47% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.56% | -0.31% |
Volatility
EMXF vs. ESGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) is 8.10%, while iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that EMXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXF | ESGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 8.56% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.13% | 17.46% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.60% | 20.10% | -1.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 19.11% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 19.94% | +1.83% |
EMXF vs. ESGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
EMXF vs. ESGE - Dividend Comparison
EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than ESGE's 1.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.75% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 1.97% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 1.86% | 0.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, EMXF and ESGE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to EMXF (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs ESGE's -41.07%.
On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.15% vs 6.83% for ESGE. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EMXF has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.
EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 1.97% for ESGE.
EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.25% for ESGE.
ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXF and ESGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer