SDEM vs. BOTZ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

SDEM (Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SDEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while BOTZ is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SDEM returned 6.12%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BOTZ. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SDEM charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.

Performance

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDEM achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -2.74% return.

SDEM

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 4.50%
• 6M: 5.07%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 1Y: 28.41%
• 3Y*: 18.54%
• 5Y*: 6.12%
• 10Y*: 4.40%
• ALL TIME*: 3.94%

BOTZ

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: -5.80%
• 6M: -5.58%
• YTD: -2.74%
• 1Y: 6.85%
• 3Y*: 7.34%
• 5Y*: 0.96%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	$28.68M	$29.79M	$37.55M
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	$101.46K	$99.85K	$114.98K

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	13.99%	32.01%	4.02%	12.64%	-21.53%	2.11%	-11.13%	17.56%	-17.40%	16.57%
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	-2.74%	14.17%	12.26%	38.97%	-42.69%	8.65%	51.92%	31.80%	-28.34%	58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SDEM and BOTZ is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016	0.53

The correlation between SDEM and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SDEM	BOTZ
Financial Services	27.7%	0.9%
Industrials	10.2%	50.8%
Real Estate	7.7%	-
Utilities	7.2%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.0%	6.2%
Communication Services	5.5%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	0.0%
Basic Materials	5.2%	0.0%
Energy	3.6%	0.5%
Technology	2.5%	30.8%
Healthcare	1.9%	8.0%

Return for Risk

SDEM vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SDEM

SDEM Risk / Return Rank: 83
SDEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SDEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SDEM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SDEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SDEM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

BOTZ

BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 16
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SDEM	BOTZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	0.22	+1.83
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	0.49	+2.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.06	+0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	0.30	+2.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.60	0.76	+8.84

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDEM and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDEM drawdown since its inception was -47.38%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDEM and BOTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDEM	BOTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.38%	-55.54%	+8.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-19.34%	+10.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.34%	-29.02%	+16.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.08%	-55.54%	+19.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.04%	-15.36%	+14.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.46%	-18.22%	-2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	7.59%	-4.56%

Volatility

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF (SDEM) is 3.94%, while Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) has a volatility of 9.07%. This indicates that SDEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDEM	BOTZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.94%	9.07%	-5.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	21.63%	-9.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.28%	26.37%	-12.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	27.27%	-9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	25.88%	-6.83%

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDEM has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDEM vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

SDEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than BOTZ's 0.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF	0.50%	0.66%	0.13%	0.20%	0.23%	0.16%	0.19%	0.83%	1.44%	0.01%	0.06%	0.00%
SDEM Global X MSCI SuperDividend Emerging Markets ETF	4.91%	5.27%	7.28%	7.50%	8.86%	8.14%	6.30%	6.47%	6.55%	5.01%	5.06%	6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDEM and BOTZ in my portfolio?

SDEM and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDEM or BOTZ?

BOTZ has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to SDEM (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDEM dropped -47.38% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

Which ETF is better, SDEM or BOTZ?

On 5-year performance, SDEM leads with 6.12% vs 0.96% for BOTZ. On fees, SDEM is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, SDEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SDEM or BOTZ?

Over the 5-year period, SDEM has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SDEM or BOTZ?

SDEM is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SDEM or BOTZ?

SDEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.50% for BOTZ.

What is the main difference between SDEM and BOTZ?

SDEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while BOTZ is Artificial Intelligence. SDEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Top 50 Dividend, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for SDEM and 0.68% for BOTZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SDEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.