SCZ vs. PXH
SCZ (iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF) and PXH (Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCZ is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while PXH is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCZ returned 8.03%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for PXH. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCZ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PXH.
Performance
SCZ vs. PXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than PXH's 14.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed PXH with an annualized return of 8.03%, while PXH has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
SCZ
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.56%
- 6M
- 12.13%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
PXH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 14.63%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 36.41%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
SCZ vs. PXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 9.56% | 32.08% | 1.52% | 12.98% | -21.27% | 10.12% | 11.71% | 24.68% | -17.64% | 32.72% |
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 14.63% | 31.44% | 12.09% | 13.93% | -15.18% | 8.31% | -1.91% | 16.77% | -8.68% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCZ and PXH is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.74 |
The correlation between SCZ and PXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCZ vs. PXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCZ
PXH
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
SCZ
PXH
Financial Services
SCZ
PXH
Consumer Cyclical
SCZ
PXH
Basic Materials
SCZ
PXH
Real Estate
SCZ
PXH
Technology
SCZ
PXH
Healthcare
SCZ
PXH
Consumer Defensive
SCZ
PXH
Communication Services
SCZ
PXH
Energy
SCZ
PXH
Utilities
SCZ
PXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCZ vs. PXH — Risk / Return Rank
SCZ
PXH
SCZ vs. PXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.39 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 3.20 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.11 | 3.57 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 13.29 | -5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.39 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.51 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.54 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.14 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SCZ vs. PXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, roughly equal to the maximum PXH drawdown of -63.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and PXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.86% | -63.63% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -10.24% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | -17.72% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.87% | -29.59% | -7.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -40.42% | -0.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.63% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -16.86% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 2.75% | +0.23% |
Volatility
SCZ vs. PXH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) is 4.57%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF (PXH) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that SCZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCZ | PXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 5.43% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 12.30% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.47% | 15.31% | -0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.78% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.43% | 20.07% | -2.64% |
SCZ vs. PXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PXH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCZ vs. PXH - Dividend Comparison
SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than PXH's 3.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PXH Invesco FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.43% | 4.02% | 4.43% | 4.84% | 5.33% | 4.69% | 2.79% | 3.28% | 3.30% | 2.74% | 1.97% | 3.44% |
SCZ iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF | 3.01% | 3.30% | 3.50% | 2.96% | 1.99% | 2.96% | 1.52% | 3.52% | 2.79% | 2.38% | 2.82% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCZ and PXH have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PXH has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to SCZ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs PXH's -63.63%.
On 10-year performance, PXH leads with 10.81% vs 8.03% for SCZ. On fees, SCZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PXH has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PXH.
PXH has the higher dividend yield at 3.43%, compared with 3.01% for SCZ.
SCZ is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PXH is Emerging Markets Equities. SCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index, while PXH tracks FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SCZ and 0.50% for PXH.
PXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCZ and PXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer