PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCZ vs. GICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCZ vs. GICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCZ achieves a 9.56% return, which is significantly lower than GICIX's 14.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SCZ has underperformed GICIX with an annualized return of 8.03%, while GICIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.94% annualized return.


SCZ

1D
-0.72%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.13%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.13%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*
8.03%

GICIX

1D
-0.16%
1M
4.64%
YTD
14.40%
6M
17.91%
1Y
34.09%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
9.70%
10Y*
9.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCZ vs. GICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
9.56%32.08%1.52%12.98%-21.27%10.12%11.71%24.68%-17.64%32.72%
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
14.40%42.83%5.57%15.11%-18.53%13.03%7.69%21.59%-18.80%33.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCZ and GICIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008

0.93

The correlation between SCZ and GICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCZ vs. GICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCZ
SCZ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GICIX
GICIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
GICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCZ vs. GICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCZGICIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

2.20

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.39

3.04

-0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

2.50

-0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

9.35

-1.27

SCZ vs. GICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the GICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCZ and GICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCZGICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.20

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.59

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Drawdowns

SCZ vs. GICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCZ drawdown since its inception was -61.86%, which is greater than GICIX's maximum drawdown of -56.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCZ and GICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCZGICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.86%

-56.71%

-5.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-13.39%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-13.39%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.87%

-34.53%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.07%

-43.84%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-1.02%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.06%

-10.93%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.56%

-0.58%

Volatility

SCZ vs. GICIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ) and Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) have volatilities of 4.57% and 4.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCZGICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

4.40%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.95%

12.68%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

15.28%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

16.54%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.43%

16.80%

+0.63%

SCZ vs. GICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCZ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GICIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCZ vs. GICIX - Dividend Comparison

SCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than GICIX's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
7.07%8.08%4.77%3.04%3.10%3.39%1.87%3.47%1.68%8.29%2.79%1.69%
SCZ
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
3.01%3.30%3.50%2.96%1.99%2.96%1.52%3.52%2.79%2.38%2.82%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SCZ and GICIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCZ has higher volatility (4.57%) compared to GICIX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCZ dropped -61.86% vs GICIX's -56.71%.

GICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCZ and GICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer