GICIX vs. FKEMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX).
GICIX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Sep 27, 2007. FKEMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | 2.90% | 42.83% | 5.57% | 15.11% | -18.53% | 13.03% | 7.69% | 21.59% | -18.80% | 33.05% |
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K | 0.98% | 31.18% | 7.26% | 15.36% | -27.42% | 1.40% | 32.68% | 33.86% | -17.92% | 46.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GICIX achieves a 2.90% return, which is significantly higher than FKEMX's 0.98% return. Over the past 10 years, GICIX has underperformed FKEMX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while FKEMX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.08% annualized return.
GICIX
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- -9.56%
- YTD
- 2.90%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 37.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
FKEMX
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 33.13%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GICIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than FKEMX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GICIX vs. FKEMX — Risk / Return Rank
GICIX
FKEMX
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GICIX | FKEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | 2.36 | +0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.34 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 2.36 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.74 | 8.85 | +1.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GICIX | FKEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 1.75 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.17 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.55 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.18 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between GICIX and FKEMX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Dividend Comparison
GICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.86%, more than FKEMX's 0.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GICIX Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund | 7.86% | 8.08% | 4.77% | 3.04% | 3.10% | 3.39% | 1.87% | 3.47% | 1.68% | 8.29% | 2.79% | 1.69% |
FKEMX Fidelity Emerging Markets K | 0.07% | 0.07% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 0.89% | 6.18% | 1.46% | 1.85% | 1.00% | 0.08% | 0.84% | 0.70% |
Drawdowns
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GICIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, smaller than the maximum FKEMX drawdown of -69.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICIX and FKEMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GICIX | FKEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.71% | -69.07% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.39% | -13.00% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.53% | -40.79% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.84% | -43.13% | -0.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.48% | -9.97% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.00% | -21.49% | +10.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 3.47% | -0.21% |
Volatility
GICIX vs. FKEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) is 7.86%, while Fidelity Emerging Markets K (FKEMX) has a volatility of 9.99%. This indicates that GICIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GICIX | FKEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 9.99% | -2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 14.56% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.41% | 19.60% | -3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 18.56% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 18.46% | -1.78% |