PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GICIX vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GICIX achieves a 13.78% return, which is significantly higher than HSCZ's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, GICIX has underperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 10.03%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 11.86% annualized return.


GICIX

1D
2.85%
1M
1.04%
6M
5.80%
YTD
13.78%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
9.35%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
7.45%

HSCZ

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.23%
6M
7.23%
YTD
11.33%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
11.86%
ALL TIME*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$2.56M$1.76M$1.27M

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
13.78%42.83%5.57%15.11%-18.53%13.03%7.69%21.59%-18.80%33.05%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
11.33%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between GICIX and HSCZ is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.76

The correlation between GICIX and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GICIX vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GICIX
GICIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
GICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
GICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
GICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GICIXHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.34

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

9.75

-1.73

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GICIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GICIX and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GICIX drawdown since its inception was -56.71%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GICIX and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GICIXHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.71%

-34.89%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.39%

-9.61%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.39%

-12.81%

-0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.53%

-20.11%

-14.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.84%

-34.89%

-8.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-1.77%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.86%

-4.60%

-6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.74%

2.31%

+1.43%

Volatility

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund (GICIX) has a higher volatility of 5.31% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.90%. This indicates that GICIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GICIXHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

3.90%

+1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.92%

10.15%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.23%

11.99%

+4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

13.51%

+3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.58%

15.35%

+1.23%

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GICIX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

GICIX vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

GICIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than HSCZ's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GICIX
Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund
7.11%8.08%4.77%3.04%3.10%3.39%1.87%3.47%1.68%8.29%2.79%1.69%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
3.13%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


GICIX and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GICIX has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to HSCZ (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GICIX dropped -56.71% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GICIX and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer