SCYB vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SCYB returned 6.99% vs 44.71% for FNDF. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCYB charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

SCYB vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCYB achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 21.21% return.

SCYB

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 6.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 21.21%
• 6M: 24.72%
• 1Y: 44.71%
• 3Y*: 24.10%
• 5Y*: 13.35%
• 10Y*: 11.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCYB vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	1.55%	8.33%	8.15%	6.74%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	21.21%	40.99%	2.29%	7.23%

Correlation

The correlation between SCYB and FNDF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023	0.64

The correlation between SCYB and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCYB vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCYB	FNDF
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	10.7%
Communication Services	8.9%	4.9%
Industrials	8.7%	15.9%
Healthcare	5.8%	5.5%
Energy	5.8%	12.3%
Financial Services	4.9%	16.7%
Technology	4.5%	11.1%
Real Estate	4.2%	0.9%
Basic Materials	3.5%	11.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	6.9%
Utilities	2.0%	3.8%

Return for Risk

SCYB vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCYB

SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 59
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 59
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 84
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCYB vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) and Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCYB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	2.99	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.81	3.89	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.53	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	4.24	-1.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.87	16.19	-3.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCYB vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCYB Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCYB and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCYB	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	2.99	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.54	+1.15

Drawdowns

SCYB vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCYB drawdown since its inception was -4.92%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCYB and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCYB	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-40.14%	+35.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.44%	-10.60%	+8.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-0.67%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-7.64%	+7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.54%	2.77%	-2.23%

Volatility

SCYB vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) is 1.07%, while Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that SCYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCYB	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.07%	5.26%	-4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.93%	12.53%	-9.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	15.06%	-11.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	16.18%	-11.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.13%	17.67%	-12.54%

SCYB vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCYB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCYB vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF	6.94%	6.99%	7.06%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCYB and FNDF in my portfolio?

SCYB and FNDF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCYB or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SCYB (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCYB dropped -4.92% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, SCYB or FNDF?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 44.71% vs 6.99% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCYB or FNDF?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 44.71% return vs 6.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCYB or FNDF?

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCYB or FNDF?

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 2.84% for FNDF.

What is the main difference between SCYB and FNDF?

SCYB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. SCYB tracks ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index, while FNDF tracks Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCYB and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.