SCUB vs. BLST

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

SCUB (Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF) and BLST (Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCUB is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Sterling Capital, while BLST is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Bluemonte. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCUB charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for BLST.

Performance

SCUB vs. BLST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SCUB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLST

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 1Y: 3.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCUB vs. BLST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.30%
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between SCUB and BLST is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026	0.61

Return for Risk

SCUB vs. BLST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCUB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLST

BLST Risk / Return Rank: 52
BLST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BLST Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BLST Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
BLST Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCUB vs. BLST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB) and Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF (BLST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCUB	BLST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.49	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.24	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.98	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.96	—

Drawdowns

SCUB vs. BLST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCUB drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum BLST drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCUB and BLST.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCUB	BLST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-1.69%	+1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.38%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SCUB	BLST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.78%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79%	2.25%	-1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.79%	2.27%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.79%	2.27%	-1.48%

SCUB vs. BLST - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCUB has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BLST's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCUB vs. BLST - Dividend Comparison

SCUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BLST's 3.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BLST Bluemonte Short Term Bond ETF	3.71%	2.11%
SCUB Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF	1.33%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCUB and BLST in my portfolio?

SCUB and BLST have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SCUB or BLST?

On fees, BLST is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCUB or BLST?

BLST is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SCUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCUB or BLST?

BLST has the higher dividend yield at 3.71%, compared with 1.33% for SCUB.

What is the main difference between SCUB and BLST?

SCUB is categorized as Actively Managed, while BLST is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Sterling Capital and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for SCUB and 0.23% for BLST.