SCO vs. SQQQ
SCO (ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - SCO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCO returned -40.39%/yr vs -54.48%/yr for SQQQ. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
SCO vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -65.39% return, which is significantly lower than SQQQ's -34.61% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -40.39%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -54.48% annualized return.
SCO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- -23.78%
- 6M
- -55.81%
- YTD
- -65.39%
- 1Y
- -58.66%
- 3Y*
- -29.81%
- 5Y*
- -39.67%
- 10Y*
- -40.39%
- ALL TIME*
- -26.09%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 9.46%
- 6M
- -32.40%
- YTD
- -34.61%
- 1Y
- -52.32%
- 3Y*
- -49.83%
- 5Y*
- -44.46%
- 10Y*
- -54.48%
- ALL TIME*
- -52.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $131.70M | $126.01M | $253.57M | |
| $2.40B | $2.29B | $2.66B |
SCO vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | -65.39% | 15.90% | -19.00% | -12.41% | -62.59% | -72.62% | -4.20% | -58.50% | 19.22% | -22.40% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -34.61% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and SQQQ is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SCO and SQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCO vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
SCO
SQQQ
SCO vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.86 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.81 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.41 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCO vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.80%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.80% | -100.00% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.24% | -61.03% | -11.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.64% | -92.51% | +17.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.80% | -97.27% | +2.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.50% | -99.97% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.77% | -100.00% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.28% | -92.78% | +7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.39% | 35.08% | +7.31% |
Volatility
SCO vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 23.27% compared to ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) at 20.82%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCO | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.27% | 20.82% | +2.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.24% | 48.09% | +3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 57.98% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.43% | 68.18% | -7.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.89% | 66.74% | +5.15% |
SCO vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCO and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
SCO vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 9.14% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCO and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCO has higher volatility (23.27%) compared to SQQQ (20.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCO dropped -99.80% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, SCO leads with -40.39% vs -54.48% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCO has performed better with a -40.39% return vs -54.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCO and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.14%, compared with 0.00% for SCO.
SCO is categorized as Oil & Gas, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. SCO tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
SQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCO and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer