SCO vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
SCO and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index (-200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both SCO and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCO or QQQ.
Performance
SCO vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCO achieves a -13.83% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 23.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SCO has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -26.92%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.08% annualized return.
SCO
-13.83%
-1.85%
5.20%
-1.69%
-42.17%
-26.92%
QQQ
23.40%
1.56%
10.75%
30.41%
20.90%
18.08%
Key characteristics
| SCO | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.05 | 1.71 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.27 | 2.29 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.03 | 1.31 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.02 | 2.19 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.11 | 7.95 |
| Ulcer Index | 21.23% | 3.73% |
| Daily Std Dev | 46.74% | 17.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.50% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -99.39% | -2.13% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCO vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SCO and QQQ is -0.26. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCO vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCO vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
SCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCO ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.60% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
SCO vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCO drawdown since its inception was -99.50%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCO and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCO vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) has a higher volatility of 16.27% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.66%. This indicates that SCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.