SCLAX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
SCLAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2012. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund | -0.59% | 6.49% | 4.92% | 6.96% | -3.74% | 1.72% | 3.30% | 7.91% | -0.67% | 3.88% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCLAX achieves a -0.59% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, SCLAX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 2.96%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
SCLAX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -0.59%
- 6M
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 4.79%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.96%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCLAX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SCLAX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
SCLAX
FASGX
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCLAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.82 | 1.41 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.01 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 2.00 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.48 | 8.74 | -0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCLAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.41 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.55 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.08 | 0.71 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.60 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCLAX and FASGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
SCLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.87% | 4.06% | 1.90% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 4.67% | 0.54% | 3.77% | 0.69% | 1.18% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCLAX drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCLAX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCLAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -47.35% | +41.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.32% | -9.07% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.59% | -23.54% | +17.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.59% | -27.20% | +21.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -5.77% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -6.74% | +5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.07% | -1.51% |
Volatility
SCLAX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) is 1.10%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that SCLAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCLAX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 5.30% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.98% | 8.12% | -6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64% | 13.00% | -10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.07% | 12.18% | -9.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 12.58% | -9.84% |