SCHZ vs. SCHJ
SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and SCHJ (Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHJ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHZ returned 0.07%/yr vs 2.31%/yr for SCHJ. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHZ charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SCHJ.
Performance
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHZ achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHJ's 0.56% return.
SCHZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.52%
SCHJ
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 4.52%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.30% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 0.03% |
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 0.56% | 6.80% | 4.89% | 6.36% | -5.73% | -0.67% | 5.30% | 0.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHZ and SCHJ is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019 | 0.79 |
The correlation between SCHZ and SCHJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHZ
SCHJ
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
SCHZ
SCHJ
Technology
SCHZ
SCHJ
Healthcare
SCHZ
SCHJ
Utilities
SCHZ
SCHJ
Communication Services
SCHZ
SCHJ
Industrials
SCHZ
SCHJ
Consumer Cyclical
SCHZ
SCHJ
Energy
SCHZ
SCHJ
Consumer Defensive
SCHZ
SCHJ
Real Estate
SCHZ
SCHJ
Basic Materials
SCHZ
SCHJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHZ vs. SCHJ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHZ
SCHJ
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) and Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHZ | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.48 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 3.08 | -1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 12.17 | -6.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHZ | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 2.42 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.79 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.64 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHZ drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, which is greater than SCHJ's maximum drawdown of -13.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHZ and SCHJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHZ | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -13.62% | -5.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.70% | -1.47% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.18% | -1.47% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.01% | -9.43% | -8.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -0.45% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.68% | -1.88% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.37% | +0.51% |
Volatility
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) at 0.55%. This indicates that SCHZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHZ | SCHJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 0.55% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 1.35% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 1.87% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.08% | 2.94% | +3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.41% | 4.13% | +1.28% |
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHZ has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHJ's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHZ vs. SCHJ - Dividend Comparison
SCHZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than SCHJ's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHJ Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.42% | 4.00% | 2.98% | 1.64% | 0.94% | 2.54% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHZ and SCHJ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHZ has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHZ dropped -18.74% vs SCHJ's -13.62%.
On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs 0.07% for SCHZ. On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs 0.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.
SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.12% for SCHZ.
SCHZ is categorized as Total Bond Market, while SCHJ is Corporate Bonds. SCHZ tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y). Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHZ and 0.05% for SCHJ.
SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHZ and SCHJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer