SCHY vs. RFDA
SCHY (Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF) and RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHY is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones International Dividend 100 Index, while RFDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by SS&C. SCHY is passively managed, while RFDA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHY returned 8.08%/yr vs 13.42%/yr for RFDA. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHY charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for RFDA.
Performance
SCHY vs. RFDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHY achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly lower than RFDA's 12.65% return.
SCHY
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 8.55%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 22.67%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.08%
- 10Y*
- —
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 12.65%
- 6M
- 13.45%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHY vs. RFDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 8.55% | 33.98% | -1.79% | 14.27% | -9.43% | 4.08% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 12.65% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHY and RFDA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between SCHY and RFDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHY vs. RFDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHY
RFDA
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
Financial Services
SCHY
RFDA
Communication Services
SCHY
RFDA
Consumer Defensive
SCHY
RFDA
Industrials
SCHY
RFDA
Energy
SCHY
RFDA
Consumer Cyclical
SCHY
RFDA
Utilities
SCHY
RFDA
Basic Materials
SCHY
RFDA
Healthcare
SCHY
RFDA
Technology
SCHY
RFDA
Real Estate
SCHY
RFDA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHY vs. RFDA — Risk / Return Rank
SCHY
RFDA
SCHY vs. RFDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) and RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHY | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 5.79 | -3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.95 | 21.14 | -13.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHY | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 2.70 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.86 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.80 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SCHY vs. RFDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHY drawdown since its inception was -24.04%, smaller than the maximum RFDA drawdown of -34.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHY and RFDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHY | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.04% | -34.60% | +10.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -5.45% | -3.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.16% | -19.35% | +7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.04% | -19.35% | -4.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | 0.00% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -3.74% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 1.49% | +1.37% |
Volatility
SCHY vs. RFDA - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF (SCHY) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) at 2.75%. This indicates that SCHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHY | RFDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 2.75% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 8.53% | +1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 11.67% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 15.74% | -2.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.23% | 16.85% | -3.62% |
SCHY vs. RFDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHY has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RFDA's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHY vs. RFDA - Dividend Comparison
SCHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than RFDA's 1.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.75% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |
SCHY Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF | 3.42% | 3.55% | 4.64% | 3.97% | 3.67% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHY and RFDA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHY has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to RFDA (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHY dropped -24.04% vs RFDA's -34.60%.
On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 13.42% vs 8.08% for SCHY. On fees, SCHY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 13.42% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.
SCHY has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 1.75% for RFDA.
SCHY is categorized as Dividend, while RFDA is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for SCHY and 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHY and RFDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer