SCHX vs. MGC
SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) and MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index while MGC tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHX returned 15.44%/yr vs 16.30%/yr for MGC. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHX charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for MGC.
Performance
SCHX vs. MGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 7.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed MGC with an annualized return of 15.44%, while MGC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.30% annualized return.
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
MGC
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 5.92%
- 1Y
- 22.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.82%
- 5Y*
- 13.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.30%
SCHX vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 7.70% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -4.66% | 21.95% |
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 7.15% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and MGC is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.99 |
The correlation between SCHX and MGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHX vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHX
MGC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
SCHX
MGC
Financial Services
SCHX
MGC
Communication Services
SCHX
MGC
Consumer Cyclical
SCHX
MGC
Industrials
SCHX
MGC
Healthcare
SCHX
MGC
Consumer Defensive
SCHX
MGC
Energy
SCHX
MGC
Utilities
SCHX
MGC
Real Estate
SCHX
MGC
Basic Materials
SCHX
MGC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHX vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHX
MGC
SCHX vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHX | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 2.32 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.29 | 9.94 | +0.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -52.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and MGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHX | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.33% | -52.26% | +17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -9.85% | +0.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.04% | -19.28% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.41% | -25.74% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -33.07% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -4.06% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.96% | -7.17% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.29% | -0.22% |
Volatility
SCHX vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 4.87%, while Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a volatility of 5.20%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHX | MGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 5.20% | -0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | 10.28% | -0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 13.06% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 17.39% | -0.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 18.24% | -0.08% |
SCHX vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHX vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than MGC's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.90% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, SCHX and MGC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MGC has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to SCHX (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs MGC's -52.26%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 16.30% vs 15.44% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 16.30% return vs 15.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for MGC.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.90% for MGC.
SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.05% for MGC.
MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHX and MGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer