PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHX vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 11.50% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 15.49%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.92% annualized return.


SCHX

1D
0.20%
1M
5.43%
YTD
11.50%
6M
11.84%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.65%
10Y*
15.49%

SCHG

1D
-0.57%
1M
5.91%
YTD
7.74%
6M
7.31%
1Y
27.05%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
11.50%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
7.74%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and SCHG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2009

0.95

The correlation between SCHX and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHX vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHX
SCHG

Technology

37.5%
46.3%

Communication Services

10.3%
16.0%

Financial Services

9.9%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
12.7%

Industrials

8.5%
5.8%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
1.7%

Energy

3.4%
0.8%

Utilities

2.6%
0.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.4%

Technology

SCHX
37.5%
SCHG
46.3%

Communication Services

SCHX
10.3%
SCHG
16.0%

Financial Services

SCHX
9.9%
SCHG
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHX
9.7%
SCHG
12.7%

Industrials

SCHX
8.5%
SCHG
5.8%

Healthcare

SCHX
8.4%
SCHG
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHX
4.5%
SCHG
1.7%

Energy

SCHX
3.4%
SCHG
0.8%

Utilities

SCHX
2.6%
SCHG
0.4%

Real Estate

SCHX
2.0%
SCHG
0.5%

Basic Materials

SCHX
1.8%
SCHG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHXSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

1.76

+0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.37

+0.95

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.70

+1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.11

5.70

+9.41

SCHX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHXSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

1.76

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.88

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.85

+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHXSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-34.59%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-16.41%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

-23.39%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-34.59%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-34.59%

+0.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.57%

+0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.97%

-5.20%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

4.90%

-2.92%

Volatility

SCHX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 2.81%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHXSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

3.31%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

11.56%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

15.45%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

22.27%

-5.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

21.55%

-3.40%

SCHX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than SCHG's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.36%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.00%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, SCHX and SCHG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHG has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to SCHX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.92% vs 15.49% for SCHX. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.36% for SCHG.

SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHX and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer