SCHX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
SCHX and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCHX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both SCHX and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SCHX or SCHG.
Performance
SCHX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 25.34% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 30.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 14.79%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
SCHX
25.34%
0.87%
12.25%
33.49%
16.83%
14.79%
SCHG
30.50%
2.16%
14.17%
37.63%
19.96%
16.38%
Key characteristics
| SCHX | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.71 | 2.24 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.62 | 2.93 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.93 | 3.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.65 | 12.26 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.90% | 3.11% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.37% | 17.00% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.33% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.19% | -3.02% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCHX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SCHX and SCHG is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SCHX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SCHX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.20% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.17% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% | 1.76% | 1.65% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
SCHX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SCHX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 4.23%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.