PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHX vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHX vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHX achieves a 9.33% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 19.19% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHX has outperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 14.84%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.83% annualized return.


SCHX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.52%
6M
7.65%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
19.03%
3Y*
19.39%
5Y*
12.25%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
14.51%

FNDA

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.37%
6M
10.86%
YTD
19.19%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.83%
ALL TIME*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHX vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
9.33%17.46%24.88%26.84%-19.41%26.81%20.81%31.22%-4.66%21.95%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
19.19%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHX and FNDA is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.82

The correlation between SCHX and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHX vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHX
FNDA

Technology

36.7%
15.2%

Financial Services

11.7%
14.8%

Communication Services

9.7%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
12.4%

Industrials

9.4%
19.1%

Healthcare

9.2%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
3.9%

Energy

3.1%
5.6%

Utilities

2.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
10.0%

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.3%

Technology

SCHX
36.7%
FNDA
15.2%

Financial Services

SCHX
11.7%
FNDA
14.8%

Communication Services

SCHX
9.7%
FNDA
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHX
9.6%
FNDA
12.4%

Industrials

SCHX
9.4%
FNDA
19.1%

Healthcare

SCHX
9.2%
FNDA
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHX
4.6%
FNDA
3.9%

Energy

SCHX
3.1%
FNDA
5.6%

Utilities

SCHX
2.2%
FNDA
3.0%

Real Estate

SCHX
2.1%
FNDA
10.0%

Basic Materials

SCHX
1.8%
FNDA
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHX vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHX
SCHX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHX vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHXFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.07

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

9.90

-0.85

SCHX vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHX and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHX vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHX drawdown since its inception was -34.33%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHX and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHXFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.33%

-44.64%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.02%

-9.36%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

-25.92%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

-25.92%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.33%

-44.64%

+10.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.95%

-1.76%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.95%

-6.64%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.90%

-0.79%

Volatility

SCHX vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is 3.18%, while Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 3.51%. This indicates that SCHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHXFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.51%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

12.09%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

17.10%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

20.74%

-3.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.14%

22.32%

-4.18%

SCHX vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHX vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FNDA's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small Company ETF
1.11%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
SCHX
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
1.04%1.09%1.22%1.39%1.64%1.22%1.64%1.82%2.02%1.70%1.92%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHX and FNDA have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDA has higher volatility (3.51%) compared to SCHX (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHX dropped -34.33% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 10-year performance, SCHX leads with 14.84% vs 10.83% for FNDA. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHX has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 14.84% return vs 10.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 1.04% for SCHX.

SCHX is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index, while FNDA tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity U.S. Small Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for SCHX and 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHX and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer