SCHV vs. VFMV

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. SCHV is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHV returned 10.33%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for VFMV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.

Performance

SCHV vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 7.46% return.

SCHV

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 3.06%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 15.31%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 10.33%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

VFMV

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.03%
• YTD: 7.46%
• 6M: 7.72%
• 1Y: 11.60%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	14.24%	16.02%	14.13%	8.93%	-7.65%	25.58%	2.64%	25.92%	-6.76%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	7.46%	10.52%	16.91%	8.86%	-5.73%	20.75%	-0.19%	27.26%	-0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and VFMV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.84

The correlation between SCHV and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHV vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHV	VFMV
Financial Services	19.6%	10.6%
Technology	18.2%	25.1%
Industrials	14.0%	10.1%
Healthcare	11.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	8.8%	9.5%
Energy	7.2%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	6.9%
Utilities	4.6%	6.7%
Real Estate	4.1%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.8%	-
Communication Services	2.5%	10.7%

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 84
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

VFMV

VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 43
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 39
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHV	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	1.32	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	1.93	+1.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.23	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.94	1.94	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.87	7.57	+8.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHV vs. VFMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the VFMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and VFMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHV	VFMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	1.32	+1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.81	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.71	0.68	+0.03

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VFMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	VFMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-33.64%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-6.00%	-0.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-10.35%	-4.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	-15.41%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-2.00%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.83%	-3.63%	-0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	1.53%	+0.16%

Volatility

SCHV vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.21%. This indicates that SCHV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	VFMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.33%	2.21%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.37%	6.37%	+2.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.80%	8.83%	+1.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	11.75%	+2.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	14.25%	+2.70%

SCHV vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SCHV vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than VFMV's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.78%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	1.95%	2.12%	1.46%	2.20%	2.08%	1.31%	2.14%	2.43%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHV and VFMV in my portfolio?

SCHV and VFMV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHV or VFMV?

SCHV has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to VFMV (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs VFMV's -33.64%.

Which ETF is better, SCHV or VFMV?

On 5-year performance, SCHV leads with 10.33% vs 9.52% for VFMV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHV or VFMV?

Over the 5-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHV or VFMV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for VFMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHV or VFMV?

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 1.78% for SCHV.

What is the main difference between SCHV and VFMV?

SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.13% for VFMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.