SCHV vs. VFLO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index while VFLO tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SCHV returned 17.25%/yr vs 24.24%/yr for VFLO. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for VFLO.

Performance

SCHV vs. VFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.65% return, which is significantly lower than VFLO's 21.09% return.

SCHV

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -1.94%
• 6M: 11.21%
• YTD: 15.65%
• 1Y: 24.95%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 10.88%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

VFLO

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 18.62%
• YTD: 21.09%
• 1Y: 36.81%
• 3Y*: 24.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. VFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	15.65%	16.02%	14.13%	7.59%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	21.09%	17.51%	21.83%	15.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and VFLO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	0.78

The correlation between SCHV and VFLO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHV vs. VFLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHV	VFLO
Technology	22.5%	44.4%
Financial Services	18.6%	0.0%
Industrials	13.6%	3.6%
Healthcare	10.9%	17.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.6%	15.9%
Energy	6.4%	8.6%
Utilities	4.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	3.9%	0.0%
Basic Materials	2.7%	4.1%
Communication Services	2.4%	4.2%

Return for Risk

SCHV vs. VFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 86
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 91
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. VFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHV	VFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.38	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.36	-0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.42	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	5.74	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.52	17.89	-3.37

SCHV vs. VFLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VFLO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and VFLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. VFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than VFLO's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and VFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHV	VFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-17.79%	-19.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.83%	-6.44%	-0.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.26%	-17.79%	+2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.61%	-1.26%	-1.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-2.46%	-1.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	2.06%	-0.34%

Volatility

SCHV vs. VFLO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.48%, while VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a volatility of 4.21%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHV	VFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.48%	4.21%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.85%	12.10%	-3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.27%	15.64%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	15.99%	-1.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.92%	15.99%	+0.93%

SCHV vs. VFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VFLO's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHV vs. VFLO - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VFLO's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.80%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.12%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHV and VFLO in my portfolio?

SCHV and VFLO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHV or VFLO?

VFLO has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCHV (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs VFLO's -17.79%.

Which ETF is better, SCHV or VFLO?

On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 24.24% vs 17.25% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHV or VFLO?

Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 24.24% return vs 17.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHV or VFLO?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHV or VFLO?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.12% for VFLO.

What is the main difference between SCHV and VFLO?

SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.39% for VFLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.