PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHV vs. SEIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHV vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 18.28% return.


SCHV

1D
0.09%
1M
5.65%
YTD
15.39%
6M
16.00%
1Y
28.49%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10.40%
10Y*
11.50%

SEIV

1D
-0.85%
1M
10.69%
YTD
18.28%
6M
21.23%
1Y
44.72%
3Y*
27.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHV vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
15.39%16.02%14.13%8.93%2.45%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
18.28%27.43%19.73%21.90%-3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHV and SEIV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022

0.90

The correlation between SCHV and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHV vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHV
SEIV

Financial Services

19.6%
23.0%

Technology

18.2%
17.0%

Industrials

14.0%
3.0%

Healthcare

11.3%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.8%
3.9%

Energy

7.2%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
18.5%

Utilities

4.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

4.1%
1.2%

Basic Materials

2.8%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.5%
6.5%

Financial Services

SCHV
19.6%
SEIV
23.0%

Technology

SCHV
18.2%
SEIV
17.0%

Industrials

SCHV
14.0%
SEIV
3.0%

Healthcare

SCHV
11.3%
SEIV
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

SCHV
8.8%
SEIV
3.9%

Energy

SCHV
7.2%
SEIV
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHV
6.9%
SEIV
18.5%

Utilities

SCHV
4.6%
SEIV
2.4%

Real Estate

SCHV
4.1%
SEIV
1.2%

Basic Materials

SCHV
2.8%
SEIV
5.1%

Communication Services

SCHV
2.5%
SEIV
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHV vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV
SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIV
SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHV vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHVSEIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.64

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

6.47

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

26.41

-9.46

SCHV vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHV and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHVSEIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

3.60

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.23

-0.51

Drawdowns

SCHV vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than SEIV's maximum drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and SEIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHVSEIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.08%

-18.18%

-18.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.83%

-6.95%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.26%

-17.71%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.85%

+0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-3.48%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.70%

-0.01%

Volatility

SCHV vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.09%, while SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 4.10%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHVSEIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

4.10%

-1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

9.08%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

12.49%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

16.68%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

16.68%

+0.26%

SCHV vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHV vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SEIV's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHV
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF
1.76%2.02%2.25%2.42%2.37%1.93%3.03%3.02%3.05%2.37%2.65%2.69%
SEIV
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Value Factor ETF
1.34%1.51%1.66%2.08%1.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHV and SEIV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEIV has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to SCHV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 27.80% vs 18.86% for SCHV. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 27.80% return vs 18.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SEIV.

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.34% for SEIV.

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.15% for SEIV.

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHV and SEIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer