SCHV vs. FMDE
SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. SCHV is passively managed, while FMDE is actively managed. Over the past year, SCHV returned 26.78% vs 17.86% for FMDE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHV charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
SCHV vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHV achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than FMDE's 8.21% return.
SCHV
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 26.78%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
FMDE
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 8.53%
- 1Y
- 17.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHV vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 14.24% | 16.02% | 14.13% | 6.83% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 8.21% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHV and FMDE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SCHV and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHV vs. FMDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHV
FMDE
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
SCHV
FMDE
Technology
SCHV
FMDE
Industrials
SCHV
FMDE
Healthcare
SCHV
FMDE
Consumer Defensive
SCHV
FMDE
Energy
SCHV
FMDE
Consumer Cyclical
SCHV
FMDE
Utilities
SCHV
FMDE
Real Estate
SCHV
FMDE
Basic Materials
SCHV
FMDE
Communication Services
SCHV
FMDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHV vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
SCHV
FMDE
SCHV vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCHV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.23 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 2.15 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.87 | 8.49 | +7.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCHV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 1.31 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.28 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
SCHV vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHV drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHV and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.08% | -21.10% | -15.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.83% | -8.33% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.08% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -2.19% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -2.64% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.11% | -0.42% |
Volatility
SCHV vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) is 3.33%, while Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that SCHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHV | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.52% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 10.03% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.80% | 13.75% | -2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 16.15% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 16.15% | +0.80% |
SCHV vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHV has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHV vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than FMDE's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.13% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 2.37% | 1.93% | 3.03% | 3.02% | 3.05% | 2.37% | 2.65% | 2.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHV and FMDE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FMDE has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to SCHV (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHV dropped -37.08% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
On 1-year performance, SCHV leads with 26.78% vs 17.86% for FMDE. On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHV has been the lower-risk option at 3.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCHV has performed better with a 26.78% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for FMDE.
SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 1.13% for FMDE.
SCHV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FMDE is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHV and 0.23% for FMDE.
SCHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHV and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer