SCHM vs. XLU
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 11.48%/yr vs 9.14%/yr for XLU. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SCHM charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
SCHM vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 11.48%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.
SCHM
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
XLU
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 11.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 9.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
SCHM vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.78% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.91% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 3.94% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and XLU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.40 |
The correlation between SCHM and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SCHM vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
XLU
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Technology
SCHM
XLU
-
Industrials
SCHM
XLU
-
Healthcare
SCHM
XLU
-
Financial Services
SCHM
XLU
-
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
XLU
-
Real Estate
SCHM
XLU
-
Basic Materials
SCHM
XLU
-
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
XLU
-
Energy
SCHM
XLU
-
Utilities
SCHM
XLU
Communication Services
SCHM
XLU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
XLU
SCHM vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 1.31 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.51 | 2.84 | +10.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -51.98% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -9.18% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -17.26% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -25.26% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -36.07% | -6.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -7.06% | +6.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.65% | -10.22% | +4.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 4.23% | -1.90% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 5.58% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 11.63% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.14% | 14.63% | +1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 17.34% | +2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.50% | 19.27% | +1.23% |
SCHM vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than XLU's 2.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.70% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHM and XLU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHM has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to XLU (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs XLU's -51.98%.
On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 9.14% for XLU. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.
SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.08% for XLU.
SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer