PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 18.78% return, which is significantly higher than XLU's 3.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHM has outperformed XLU with an annualized return of 11.48%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively lower 9.14% annualized return.


SCHM

1D
2.98%
1M
3.25%
YTD
18.78%
6M
15.85%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
11.48%

XLU

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.52%
YTD
3.91%
6M
3.83%
1Y
11.99%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
18.78%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
3.91%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and XLU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.40

The correlation between SCHM and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHM vs. XLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
XLU

Technology

22.5%

-

Industrials

21.6%

-

Healthcare

11.1%

-

Financial Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Real Estate

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.6%

-

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

3.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

2.5%

-

Technology

SCHM
22.5%
XLU

-

Industrials

SCHM
21.6%
XLU

-

Healthcare

SCHM
11.1%
XLU

-

Financial Services

SCHM
10.9%
XLU

-

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
9.7%
XLU

-

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
XLU

-

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.9%
XLU

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.6%
XLU

-

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
XLU

-

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
XLU
100.0%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.5%
XLU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHMXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.15

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

1.31

+2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

2.84

+10.67

SCHM vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-51.98%

+9.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-9.18%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-17.26%

-6.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-25.26%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-36.07%

-6.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-7.06%

+6.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.65%

-10.22%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

4.23%

-1.90%

Volatility

SCHM vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) have volatilities of 5.59% and 5.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

5.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

11.63%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.14%

14.63%

+1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.34%

+2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

19.27%

+1.23%

SCHM vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHM vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than XLU's 2.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.70%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and XLU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHM has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to XLU (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.48% vs 9.14% for XLU. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLU.

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.

SCHM is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while XLU is Utilities Equities. SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.08% for XLU.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer