PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHM vs. IPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHM vs. IPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHM achieves a 19.05% return, which is significantly lower than IPO's 24.62% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 11.37% annualized return and IPO not far behind at 11.27%.


SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%

IPO

1D
-1.25%
1M
13.25%
YTD
24.62%
6M
22.81%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
23.03%
5Y*
-1.29%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHM vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.05%10.17%11.98%16.69%-17.07%19.36%15.26%27.48%-8.77%19.60%
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
24.62%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHM and IPO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013

0.72

The correlation between SCHM and IPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHM vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHM
IPO

Technology

22.0%
40.3%

Industrials

21.4%
9.1%

Financial Services

11.3%
4.3%

Healthcare

10.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
14.4%

Real Estate

6.5%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
9.2%

Energy

3.6%
1.1%

Utilities

3.0%
0.3%

Communication Services

2.6%
6.6%

Technology

SCHM
22.0%
IPO
40.3%

Industrials

SCHM
21.4%
IPO
9.1%

Financial Services

SCHM
11.3%
IPO
4.3%

Healthcare

SCHM
10.8%
IPO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHM
10.3%
IPO
14.4%

Real Estate

SCHM
6.5%
IPO
4.0%

Basic Materials

SCHM
4.7%
IPO

-

Consumer Defensive

SCHM
3.8%
IPO
9.2%

Energy

SCHM
3.6%
IPO
1.1%

Utilities

SCHM
3.0%
IPO
0.3%

Communication Services

SCHM
2.6%
IPO
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHM vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHM vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHMIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

1.21

+2.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.11

2.71

+11.40

SCHM vs. IPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHM Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the IPO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHM and IPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHMIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.10

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.04

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.36

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.31

+0.28

Drawdowns

SCHM vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and IPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHMIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.43%

-68.76%

+26.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-26.24%

+16.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

-32.04%

+8.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

-66.02%

+39.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

-68.76%

+26.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-24.70%

+24.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-22.93%

+17.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

11.67%

-9.36%

Volatility

SCHM vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) is 4.72%, while Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that SCHM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHMIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

9.64%

-4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

22.28%

-10.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

28.91%

-13.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.56%

35.85%

-16.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

31.50%

-11.04%

SCHM vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHM has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHM vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison

SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than IPO's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.46%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHM and IPO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPO has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to SCHM (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs IPO's -68.76%.

On 10-year performance, SCHM leads with 11.37% vs 11.27% for IPO. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 11.37% return vs 11.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.46% for IPO.

SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHM and 0.60% for IPO.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHM and IPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer