SCHM vs. IMCB
SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - SCHM tracks the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHM returned 10.94%/yr vs 11.29%/yr for IMCB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.04% expense ratio.
Performance
SCHM vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SCHM having a 17.66% return and IMCB slightly higher at 17.96%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SCHM having a 10.94% annualized return and IMCB not far ahead at 11.29%.
SCHM
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 17.66%
- 1Y
- 25.66%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
IMCB
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 1Y
- 23.04%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 11.29%
SCHM vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 17.66% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 17.96% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 16.37% | -16.09% | 22.81% | 13.35% | 31.49% | -11.53% | 19.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHM and IMCB is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.96 |
The correlation between SCHM and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHM vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHM
IMCB
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Technology
SCHM
IMCB
Industrials
SCHM
IMCB
Financial Services
SCHM
IMCB
Healthcare
SCHM
IMCB
Consumer Cyclical
SCHM
IMCB
Real Estate
SCHM
IMCB
Basic Materials
SCHM
IMCB
Consumer Defensive
SCHM
IMCB
Energy
SCHM
IMCB
Utilities
SCHM
IMCB
Communication Services
SCHM
IMCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHM vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
SCHM
IMCB
SCHM vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHM | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.31 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | 2.88 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 11.29 | -0.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHM vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHM drawdown since its inception was -42.43%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHM and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHM | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.43% | -58.80% | +16.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.32% | -8.05% | -1.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.27% | -19.80% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.46% | -25.15% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.43% | -40.99% | -1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.56% | -0.16% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -7.69% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.43% | 2.05% | +0.38% |
Volatility
SCHM vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) at 2.44%. This indicates that SCHM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHM | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 2.44% | +2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 10.04% | +2.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.51% | 13.11% | +3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.70% | 17.61% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.46% | 19.60% | +0.86% |
SCHM vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SCHM and IMCB have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHM vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
SCHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than IMCB's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.26% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SCHM and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHM has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to IMCB (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHM dropped -42.43% vs IMCB's -58.80%.
On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.29% vs 10.94% for SCHM. Both ETFs have the same 0.04% expense ratio. On volatility, IMCB has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.29% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM and IMCB have the same expense ratio: 0.04% per year.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.21% for IMCB.
SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares.
IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHM and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer