PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.56% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return.


SCHJ

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.56%
6M
0.86%
1Y
4.52%
3Y*
5.49%
5Y*
2.31%
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.07%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.00%
5Y*
1.22%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.56%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.18%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and VCIT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2019

0.86

The correlation between SCHJ and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHJVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.27

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.08

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.17

6.95

+5.22

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHJVCITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

1.50

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.19

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.75

-0.12

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-20.56%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-2.96%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-6.11%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-20.56%

+11.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-1.36%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.88%

-3.16%

+1.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.88%

-0.51%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.55%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 1.38%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

1.38%

-0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.35%

3.06%

-1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87%

4.10%

-2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

6.61%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

6.28%

-2.15%

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.50%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.80%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, SCHJ and VCIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VCIT has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to SCHJ (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 5-year performance, SCHJ leads with 2.31% vs 1.22% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHJ has performed better with a 2.31% return vs 1.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.

VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.50% for SCHJ.

SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while VCIT tracks Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.04% for VCIT.

SCHJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer