PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHJ vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHJ achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 25.74% return.


SCHJ

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.00%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5.63%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

SCHA

1D
2.21%
1M
5.28%
YTD
25.74%
6M
22.76%
1Y
45.10%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
0.88%6.80%4.89%6.36%-5.73%-0.67%5.30%0.61%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
25.74%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.23

The correlation between SCHJ and SCHA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHJ vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHJ
SCHJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SCHJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHJSCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.40

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

4.77

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

17.45

-6.44

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHJ and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHJ drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHA drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHJ and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHJSCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-42.41%

+28.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-9.50%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.47%

-27.29%

+25.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.43%

-30.79%

+21.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-7.56%

+5.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

2.59%

-2.21%

Volatility

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF (SCHJ) is 0.69%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that SCHJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHJSCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

6.79%

-6.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.47%

14.03%

-12.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91%

18.82%

-16.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.95%

22.06%

-19.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

22.75%

-18.63%

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHJ has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHJ vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

SCHJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than SCHA's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
1.00%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
SCHJ
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
4.49%4.42%4.00%2.98%1.64%0.94%2.54%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHJ and SCHA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHA has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to SCHJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHJ dropped -13.62% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 5-year performance, SCHA leads with 7.75% vs 2.41% for SCHJ. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for SCHJ.

SCHJ has the higher dividend yield at 4.49%, compared with 1.00% for SCHA.

SCHJ is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHJ tracks Bloomberg US Corporate (1-5 Y), while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SCHJ and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHJ and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer