SCHH vs. VT
SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHH returned 4.51%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHH charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SCHH vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 4.51%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 16.33%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 11.02%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 4.51%
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
SCHH vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 16.33% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHH and VT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHH and VT has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SCHH vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHH
VT
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
SCHH
VT
Basic Materials
SCHH
VT
Financial Services
SCHH
VT
Communication Services
SCHH
-
VT
Consumer Cyclical
SCHH
-
VT
Consumer Defensive
SCHH
-
VT
Energy
SCHH
-
VT
Healthcare
SCHH
-
VT
Industrials
SCHH
-
VT
Technology
SCHH
-
VT
Utilities
SCHH
-
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHH vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SCHH
VT
SCHH vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHH | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.68 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 11.67 | -5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHH vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHH | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.22% | -50.27% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.28% | -9.67% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.76% | -16.51% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.28% | -26.38% | -6.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.22% | -34.24% | -9.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.92% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.43% | -7.01% | -2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.22% | +0.41% |
Volatility
SCHH vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.83%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHH | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.83% | 5.26% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 11.01% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.56% | 13.38% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 16.15% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.99% | 17.27% | +3.72% |
SCHH vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHH vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.69% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHH and VT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SCHH.
SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
SCHH is categorized as REIT, while VT is Global Equities. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHH and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer