PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHH vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHH vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHH achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 85.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHH has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of 4.28%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.13% annualized return.


SCHH

1D
1.69%
1M
0.69%
YTD
12.96%
6M
12.23%
1Y
13.99%
3Y*
10.72%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
4.28%

BNO

1D
-2.71%
1M
-9.80%
YTD
85.31%
6M
79.66%
1Y
88.71%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
23.48%
10Y*
13.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHH vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
12.96%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
85.31%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHH and BNO is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011

0.10

The correlation between SCHH and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHH vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHH vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHHBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.36

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

4.99

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.34

9.39

-4.05

SCHH vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHH Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHH and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHHBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.15

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

0.67

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

0.36

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.14

+0.21

Drawdowns

SCHH vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHH drawdown since its inception was -44.22%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHH and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHHBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.22%

-87.06%

+42.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-17.87%

+9.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-23.75%

+5.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.28%

-33.70%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.22%

-75.18%

+30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.55%

-12.72%

+11.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.45%

-40.16%

+30.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

9.48%

-6.85%

Volatility

SCHH vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) is 4.17%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.12%. This indicates that SCHH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHHBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

14.12%

-9.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.61%

36.21%

-26.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.27%

41.56%

-28.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.72%

35.40%

-16.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

36.69%

-15.72%

SCHH vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHH has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHH vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

SCHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.77%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHH and BNO have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.12%) compared to SCHH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHH dropped -44.22% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 13.13% vs 4.28% for SCHH. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

SCHH is categorized as REIT, while BNO is Oil & Gas. SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SCHH and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHH and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer