PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHG vs. SCMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHG vs. SCMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 3.75% return, which is significantly higher than SCMB's 1.03% return.


SCHG

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
3.75%
6M
2.93%
1Y
20.82%
3Y*
24.03%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
18.53%

SCMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.25%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.39%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. SCMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.75%17.50%34.95%50.10%1.30%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
1.03%3.78%0.91%5.86%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and SCMB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

0.13

SCHG vs. SCMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHG
SCMB

Technology

46.3%
0.9%

Communication Services

16.0%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
2.6%

Healthcare

7.7%
0.1%

Financial Services

6.7%
8.8%

Industrials

5.8%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.4%
0.0%

Energy

0.8%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.5%
3.4%

Utilities

0.4%
0.2%

Technology

SCHG
46.3%
SCMB
0.9%

Communication Services

SCHG
16.0%
SCMB
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHG
12.7%
SCMB
2.6%

Healthcare

SCHG
7.7%
SCMB
0.1%

Financial Services

SCHG
6.7%
SCMB
8.8%

Industrials

SCHG
5.8%
SCMB
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

SCHG
1.7%
SCMB
0.1%

Basic Materials

SCHG
1.4%
SCMB
0.0%

Energy

SCHG
0.8%
SCMB
0.0%

Real Estate

SCHG
0.5%
SCMB
3.4%

Utilities

SCHG
0.4%
SCMB
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHG vs. SCMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SCMB
SCMB Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
SCMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCMB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SCMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. SCMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHGSCMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.33

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

7.75

-3.50

SCHG vs. SCMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SCMB Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and SCMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHGSCMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

2.34

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.97

-0.14

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. SCMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, which is greater than SCMB's maximum drawdown of -6.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and SCMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHGSCMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.59%

-6.13%

-28.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.41%

-2.92%

-13.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.39%

-5.57%

-17.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.25%

-0.90%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-1.32%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

0.88%

+4.03%

Volatility

SCHG vs. SCMB - Volatility Comparison

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) at 1.00%. This indicates that SCHG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHGSCMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

1.00%

+3.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

2.17%

+9.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.77%

2.91%

+12.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.31%

4.16%

+18.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.58%

4.16%

+17.42%

SCHG vs. SCMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SCMB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHG vs. SCMB - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than SCMB's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
3.54%3.36%3.34%3.10%0.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHG and SCMB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHG has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to SCMB (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs SCMB's -6.13%.

On 3-year performance, SCHG leads with 24.03% vs 3.23% for SCMB. On fees, SCMB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 24.03% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCMB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.

SCMB has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SCMB is Municipal Bonds. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while SCMB tracks ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.03% for SCMB.

SCMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHG and SCMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer