SCMB vs. MUST
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST).
SCMB and MUST are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SCMB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the ICE AMT-Free Core U.S. National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Oct 11, 2022. MUST is a passively managed fund by Ameriprise Financial that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Beta Advantage Multi-Sector Municipal Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 10, 2018. Both SCMB and MUST are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SCMB vs. MUST - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SCMB vs. MUST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | -0.51% | 3.78% | 0.91% | 5.86% | 3.05% |
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 0.02% | 4.92% | 0.37% | 6.23% | 3.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCMB achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than MUST's 0.02% return.
SCMB
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.42%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUST
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 1.52%
- 1Y
- 5.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SCMB vs. MUST - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCMB has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than MUST's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SCMB vs. MUST — Risk / Return Rank
SCMB
MUST
SCMB vs. MUST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) and Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SCMB | MUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 1.10 | +0.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.16 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 4.26 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SCMB | MUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.51 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between SCMB and MUST is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
SCMB vs. MUST - Dividend Comparison
SCMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than MUST's 3.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCMB Schwab Municipal Bond ETF | 3.38% | 3.36% | 3.34% | 3.10% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUST Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF | 3.29% | 3.28% | 3.13% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 1.62% | 2.33% | 2.70% | 0.55% |
Drawdowns
SCMB vs. MUST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCMB drawdown since its inception was -6.13%, smaller than the maximum MUST drawdown of -13.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCMB and MUST.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCMB | MUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.13% | -13.83% | +7.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.79% | -4.56% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -2.49% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.32% | -3.44% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.34% | 1.25% | +0.09% |
Volatility
SCMB vs. MUST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Municipal Bond ETF (SCMB) is 1.47%, while Columbia Multi-Sector Municipal Income ETF (MUST) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that SCMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SCMB | MUST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 1.84% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.02% | 3.43% | -1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.15% | 6.60% | -2.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 5.38% | -1.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.22% | 5.60% | -1.38% |