SCHG vs. RGTI
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 14.33%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHG vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than RGTI's -5.28% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
RGTI
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- 84.04%
- 3Y*
- 152.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 17.82% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -5.28% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and RGTI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
RGTI
SCHG vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.19 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 1.47 | +2.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -96.89% | +62.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -77.10% | +60.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -78.83% | +55.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -96.89% | +62.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -62.76% | +57.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -58.84% | +53.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 49.98% | -45.02% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a volatility of 44.79%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 44.79% | -39.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 71.15% | -58.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 109.21% | -93.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 128.97% | -106.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 127.17% | -105.59% |
Dividends
SCHG vs. RGTI - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while RGTI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and RGTI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs RGTI's -96.89%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer