RGTI vs. QUBT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT).

Performance

RGTI vs. QUBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RGTI vs. QUBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc	-39.05%	45.15%	1,449.40%	35.07%	-92.91%	3.94%
QUBT Quantum Computing, Inc.	-35.28%	-38.01%	1,712.51%	-39.53%	-55.72%	-46.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap RGTI : $4.18B QUBT : $1.43B
EPS RGTI : -$0.70 QUBT : -$0.11
PS Ratio RGTI : 592.37 QUBT : 1.70K
PB Ratio RGTI : 7.66 QUBT : 0.90
Total Revenue (TTM) RGTI : $7.09M QUBT : $682.00K
Gross Profit (TTM) RGTI : $2.06M QUBT : $67.00K
EBITDA (TTM) RGTI : -$255.56M QUBT : -$36.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RGTI achieves a -39.05% return, which is significantly lower than QUBT's -35.28% return.

RGTI

• 1D: -3.85%
• 1M: -23.69%
• YTD: -39.05%
• 6M: -54.77%
• 1Y: 72.86%
• 3Y*: 165.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUBT

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -22.70%
• YTD: -35.28%
• 6M: -65.00%
• 1Y: -14.43%
• 3Y*: 71.78%
• 5Y*: -1.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

RGTI vs. QUBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RGTI

RGTI Risk / Return Rank: 64
RGTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
RGTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RGTI Omega Ratio Rank: 65
RGTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
RGTI Martin Ratio Rank: 58

QUBT

QUBT Risk / Return Rank: 38
QUBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QUBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QUBT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QUBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
QUBT Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RGTI vs. QUBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) and Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RGTI	QUBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.67	-0.13	+0.79
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.80	0.70	+1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.07	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	-0.23	+1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.73	-0.42	+2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RGTI vs. QUBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RGTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is higher than the QUBT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RGTI and QUBT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RGTI	QUBT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67	-0.13	+0.79
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.01	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.02	+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between RGTI and QUBT is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RGTI vs. QUBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither RGTI nor QUBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

RGTI vs. QUBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RGTI drawdown since its inception was -96.89%, roughly equal to the maximum QUBT drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RGTI and QUBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	RGTI	QUBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.89%	-97.53%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-77.10%	-74.37%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-95.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-76.04%	-74.14%	-1.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.60%	-73.24%	+14.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	40.84%	40.75%	+0.09%

Volatility

RGTI vs. QUBT - Volatility Comparison

Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) has a higher volatility of 18.75% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc. (QUBT) at 17.25%. This indicates that RGTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RGTI	QUBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.75%	17.25%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	74.25%	70.90%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	109.71%	114.38%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.34%	134.20%	-6.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.34%	179.10%	-51.76%

Financials