SCHG vs. HOOD
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while HOOD (Robinhood Markets, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SCHG returned 21.96%/yr vs 98.15%/yr for HOOD. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
SCHG vs. HOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than HOOD's -12.22% return.
SCHG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- 15.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.96%
- 5Y*
- 13.32%
- 10Y*
- 18.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.37%
HOOD
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -8.20%
- 6M
- -8.70%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 1Y
- -9.53%
- 3Y*
- 98.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 21.29%
SCHG vs. HOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.93% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 7.98% |
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | -12.22% | 203.54% | 192.46% | 56.51% | -54.17% | -53.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and HOOD is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between SCHG and HOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. HOOD — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
HOOD
SCHG vs. HOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.03 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | -0.17 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | -0.29 | +3.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. HOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum HOOD drawdown of -90.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and HOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -90.21% | +55.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -57.26% | +40.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -57.26% | +33.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.16% | -34.88% | +31.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -60.27% | +55.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.12% | 33.07% | -27.95% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. HOOD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 4.47%, while Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) has a volatility of 19.39%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | HOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 19.39% | -14.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.82% | 52.44% | -39.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.43% | 69.79% | -53.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 73.98% | -51.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 73.98% | -52.41% |
Dividends
SCHG vs. HOOD - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while HOOD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOOD Robinhood Markets, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and HOOD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HOOD has higher volatility (19.39%) compared to SCHG (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs HOOD's -90.21%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and HOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer