SCHG vs. FTEC
SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while FTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHG returned 18.50%/yr vs 24.98%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
SCHG vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 24.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHG has underperformed FTEC with an annualized return of 18.50%, while FTEC has yielded a comparatively higher 24.98% annualized return.
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 2.58%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.33%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
FTEC
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 24.27%
- 6M
- 24.36%
- 1Y
- 48.62%
- 3Y*
- 30.29%
- 5Y*
- 20.63%
- 10Y*
- 24.98%
SCHG vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.58% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 24.27% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 45.83% | 48.93% | -0.39% | 36.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHG and FTEC is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.94 |
The correlation between SCHG and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHG vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHG
FTEC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SCHG
FTEC
Communication Services
SCHG
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
SCHG
FTEC
Healthcare
SCHG
FTEC
-
Financial Services
SCHG
FTEC
Industrials
SCHG
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
SCHG
FTEC
-
Basic Materials
SCHG
FTEC
-
Energy
SCHG
FTEC
Real Estate
SCHG
FTEC
-
Utilities
SCHG
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHG vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
SCHG
FTEC
SCHG vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.37 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 3.00 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 9.36 | -5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHG vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.59% | -34.95% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.41% | -16.26% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.39% | -27.30% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.59% | -34.95% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.59% | -34.95% | +0.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.33% | -7.18% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -5.57% | +0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.96% | 5.21% | -0.25% |
Volatility
SCHG vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.14%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 10.02%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHG | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 10.02% | -4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | 18.06% | -5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 22.07% | -6.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.33% | 25.45% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.58% | 24.81% | -3.23% |
SCHG vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SCHG vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than FTEC's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHG and FTEC have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to SCHG (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 10-year performance, FTEC leads with 24.98% vs 18.50% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 24.98% return vs 18.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for FTEC.
SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.34% for FTEC.
SCHG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FTEC is Technology Equities. SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHG and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer