SCHG vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SCHG is passively managed, while FBCG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 15.59%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for FBCG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

SCHG vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 6.42% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 15.59% return.

SCHG

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.81%
• YTD: 6.42%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 25.02%
• 5Y*: 15.59%
• 10Y*: 18.77%

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	6.42%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	30.58%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	18.60%	39.05%	57.98%	-39.10%	21.34%	42.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and FBCG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2020	0.96

The correlation between SCHG and FBCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHG vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHG	FBCG
Technology	46.3%	48.3%
Communication Services	16.0%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	17.2%
Healthcare	7.7%	6.7%
Financial Services	6.7%	2.2%
Industrials	5.8%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.7%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.6%
Energy	0.8%	0.4%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.7%
Utilities	0.4%	0.5%

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 39
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SCHG	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.14	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.84	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.36	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	2.61	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.04	10.14	-5.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SCHG vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and FBCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SCHG	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	2.14	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.62	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.84	0.83	+0.01

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-43.56%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-15.17%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-27.89%	+4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-43.56%	+8.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-1.05%	-0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-11.49%	+6.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.90%	3.90%	+1.00%

Volatility

SCHG vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 3.61%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.61%	4.79%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	13.89%	-2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	18.55%	-3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.27%	25.79%	-3.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.55%	25.72%	-4.17%

SCHG vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.36%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and FBCG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, SCHG and FBCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, SCHG or FBCG?

FBCG has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to SCHG (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs FBCG's -43.56%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or FBCG?

On 5-year performance, FBCG leads with 15.84% vs 15.59% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or FBCG?

Over the 5-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 15.84% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or FBCG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or FBCG?

SCHG has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between SCHG and FBCG?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.59% for FBCG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.