SCHG vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - SCHG tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index while BIBL tracks the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SCHG returned 13.27%/yr vs 10.30%/yr for BIBL. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SCHG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

SCHG vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHG achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 24.57% return.

SCHG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -3.93%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 17.91%
• 3Y*: 22.13%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 18.65%

BIBL

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 24.57%
• 6M: 23.10%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: 22.41%
• 5Y*: 10.30%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHG vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	1.35%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	4.34%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	24.57%	17.27%	12.49%	17.87%	-23.26%	27.44%	22.62%	29.68%	-7.64%	4.42%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHG and BIBL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2017	0.81

The correlation between SCHG and BIBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHG vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SCHG	BIBL
Technology	46.7%	31.9%
Communication Services	15.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	0.3%
Healthcare	8.4%	4.1%
Financial Services	6.6%	8.5%
Industrials	6.0%	27.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	0.4%
Basic Materials	1.3%	4.3%
Energy	0.7%	6.0%
Real Estate	0.5%	13.7%
Utilities	0.4%	3.3%

Return for Risk

SCHG vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 28
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 82
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 76
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHG vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SCHG	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.45	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	3.25	-1.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.42	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	4.51	-3.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.58	19.18	-15.60

SCHG vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHG and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SCHG vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHG drawdown since its inception was -34.59%, roughly equal to the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHG and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	SCHG	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.59%	-36.12%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.41%	-8.94%	-7.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.39%	-20.60%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.59%	-30.85%	-3.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.46%	-2.18%	-4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.20%	-7.00%	+1.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.02%	2.10%	+2.92%

Volatility

SCHG vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is 5.91%, while Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that SCHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SCHG	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.91%	6.91%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.52%	13.67%	-1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.24%	16.47%	-0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.38%	19.76%	+2.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.58%	21.11%	+0.47%

SCHG vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SCHG vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than BIBL's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SCHG and BIBL in my portfolio?

SCHG and BIBL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SCHG or BIBL?

BIBL has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to SCHG (5.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHG dropped -34.59% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, SCHG or BIBL?

On 5-year performance, SCHG leads with 13.27% vs 10.30% for BIBL. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 5.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SCHG or BIBL?

Over the 5-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 13.27% return vs 10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SCHG or BIBL?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BIBL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SCHG or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between SCHG and BIBL?

SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for SCHG and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.