PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 10.82%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.


SCHF

1D
0.29%
1M
1.57%
YTD
15.39%
6M
17.24%
1Y
30.20%
3Y*
19.18%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
10.82%

XME

1D
1.77%
1M
-2.35%
YTD
16.32%
6M
18.13%
1Y
86.41%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
19.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
15.39%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%22.26%-14.29%26.03%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
16.32%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and XME is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.64

The correlation between SCHF and XME has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
XME

Financial Services

24.0%

-

Technology

21.4%
2.2%

Industrials

8.9%
0.4%

Healthcare

7.3%

-

Basic Materials

5.8%
75.3%

Energy

5.5%
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%

-

Communication Services

1.8%

-

Utilities

1.0%

-

Real Estate

0.2%

-

Financial Services

SCHF
24.0%
XME

-

Technology

SCHF
21.4%
XME
2.2%

Industrials

SCHF
8.9%
XME
0.4%

Healthcare

SCHF
7.3%
XME

-

Basic Materials

SCHF
5.8%
XME
75.3%

Energy

SCHF
5.5%
XME
23.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
4.5%
XME
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
4.4%
XME

-

Communication Services

SCHF
1.8%
XME

-

Utilities

SCHF
1.0%
XME

-

Real Estate

SCHF
0.2%
XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHFXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

3.84

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

9.58

+0.57

SCHF vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and XME.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-85.89%

+51.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-22.60%

+11.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-30.47%

+17.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-37.27%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

-61.69%

+26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-9.33%

+8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-44.09%

+36.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

9.05%

-6.06%

Volatility

SCHF vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) is 6.91%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that SCHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

15.26%

-8.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

28.51%

-14.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

36.11%

-19.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.56%

32.84%

-16.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.24%

32.96%

-15.72%

SCHF vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHF vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.96%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHF and XME have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to SCHF (6.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 10.82% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHF has been the lower-risk option at 6.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.

SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.96%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XME is Materials. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer