SCHF vs. DGRW
SCHF (Schwab International Equity ETF) and DGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SCHF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while DGRW is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SCHF returned 10.58%/yr vs 14.04%/yr for DGRW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SCHF charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for DGRW.
Performance
SCHF vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.69% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHF has underperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 10.58%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively higher 14.04% annualized return.
SCHF
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 3.18%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 36.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
DGRW
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 7.69%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 19.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.03%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
SCHF vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 17.43% | 34.55% | 3.28% | 18.35% | -14.80% | 11.40% | 9.48% | 22.26% | -14.29% | 26.03% |
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 7.69% | 12.17% | 16.98% | 18.66% | -6.33% | 24.46% | 13.87% | 29.54% | -5.38% | 26.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHF and DGRW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013 | 0.78 |
The correlation between SCHF and DGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
SCHF vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SCHF
DGRW
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SCHF
DGRW
Industrials
SCHF
DGRW
Technology
SCHF
DGRW
Basic Materials
SCHF
DGRW
Consumer Cyclical
SCHF
DGRW
Healthcare
SCHF
DGRW
Consumer Defensive
SCHF
DGRW
Energy
SCHF
DGRW
Communication Services
SCHF
DGRW
Utilities
SCHF
DGRW
Real Estate
SCHF
DGRW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHF vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank
SCHF
DGRW
SCHF vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.35 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.31 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 9.90 | +1.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHF vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and DGRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.87% | -32.04% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -8.30% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -16.21% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -17.27% | -11.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.87% | -32.04% | -2.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.10% | +2.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -3.01% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | 1.93% | +1.05% |
Volatility
SCHF vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 6.60% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.68%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHF | DGRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 3.68% | +2.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 8.22% | +6.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.63% | 10.25% | +6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 14.02% | +2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 16.24% | +1.00% |
SCHF vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
SCHF vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison
SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than DGRW's 1.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.29% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.15% | 1.78% | 1.93% | 2.20% | 2.42% | 1.71% | 2.13% | 2.18% |
SCHF Schwab International Equity ETF | 2.91% | 3.42% | 3.26% | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.19% | 2.08% | 2.95% | 3.06% | 2.35% | 2.58% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHF and DGRW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHF has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to DGRW (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs DGRW's -32.04%.
On 10-year performance, DGRW leads with 14.04% vs 10.58% for SCHF. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DGRW has performed better with a 14.04% return vs 10.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DGRW.
SCHF has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.29% for DGRW.
SCHF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGRW is Dividend. SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.28% for DGRW.
SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHF and DGRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer