PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHF vs. BBIN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHF vs. BBIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHF achieves a 16.56% return, which is significantly higher than BBIN's 9.35% return.


SCHF

1D
0.54%
1M
5.58%
YTD
16.56%
6M
20.34%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
10.37%

BBIN

1D
0.57%
1M
2.54%
YTD
9.35%
6M
12.30%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHF vs. BBIN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
16.56%34.55%3.28%18.35%-14.80%11.40%9.48%3.56%
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
9.35%31.86%3.65%18.54%-14.29%11.74%7.91%3.14%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHF and BBIN is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2019

0.99

The correlation between SCHF and BBIN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHF vs. BBIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHF
BBIN

Financial Services

20.6%
24.8%

Technology

15.7%
12.5%

Industrials

11.5%
16.6%

Basic Materials

6.5%
5.0%

Healthcare

6.5%
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
5.4%

Energy

5.0%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.9%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.3%

Utilities

1.7%
1.7%

Financial Services

SCHF
20.6%
BBIN
24.8%

Technology

SCHF
15.7%
BBIN
12.5%

Industrials

SCHF
11.5%
BBIN
16.6%

Basic Materials

SCHF
6.5%
BBIN
5.0%

Healthcare

SCHF
6.5%
BBIN
9.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHF
5.7%
BBIN
5.4%

Energy

SCHF
5.0%
BBIN
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHF
4.9%
BBIN
5.9%

Communication Services

SCHF
2.3%
BBIN
3.2%

Real Estate

SCHF
1.7%
BBIN
0.3%

Utilities

SCHF
1.7%
BBIN
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHF vs. BBIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHF
SCHF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIN
BBIN Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
BBIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIN Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHF vs. BBIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHFBBINDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.38

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.89

2.01

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.25

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

1.98

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.70

7.38

+4.33

SCHF vs. BBIN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHF Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the BBIN Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHF and BBIN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHFBBINDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.38

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.54

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.54

-0.10

Drawdowns

SCHF vs. BBIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHF drawdown since its inception was -34.87%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIN drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHF and BBIN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHFBBINDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.87%

-33.37%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.48%

-11.57%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

-13.98%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-29.24%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.14%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.38%

-6.31%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.11%

-0.16%

Volatility

SCHF vs. BBIN - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Equity ETF (SCHF) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF (BBIN) at 5.31%. This indicates that SCHF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHFBBINDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

5.31%

+0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.32%

12.77%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

15.59%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

16.57%

-0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

19.13%

-1.94%

SCHF vs. BBIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHF has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than BBIN's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHF vs. BBIN - Dividend Comparison

SCHF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than BBIN's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIN
JPMorgan BetaBuilders International Equity ETF
3.61%3.87%3.41%3.20%2.83%3.54%1.07%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHF
Schwab International Equity ETF
2.93%3.42%3.26%2.97%2.80%3.19%2.08%2.95%3.06%2.35%2.58%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, SCHF and BBIN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SCHF has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to BBIN (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHF dropped -34.87% vs BBIN's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHF leads with 10.24% vs 8.84% for BBIN. On fees, SCHF is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BBIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHF has performed better with a 10.24% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHF is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for BBIN.

BBIN has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.93% for SCHF.

SCHF tracks FTSE Developed ex U.S. Index, while BBIN tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-North America Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHF and 0.07% for BBIN.

SCHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHF and BBIN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer