PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHE vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHE vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 3.59% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHE has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 8.21%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.38% annualized return.


SCHE

1D
-4.07%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
7.33%
6M
7.81%
1Y
23.65%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
8.21%

SCHG

1D
-2.99%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
3.59%
6M
2.53%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
23.83%
5Y*
14.97%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHE vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
7.33%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
3.59%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHE and SCHG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2010

0.68

The correlation between SCHE and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (3 years) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SCHE vs. SCHG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHE
SCHG

Technology

30.8%
46.3%

Financial Services

13.6%
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
12.7%

Communication Services

5.2%
16.0%

Industrials

4.9%
5.8%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.4%

Energy

3.1%
0.8%

Healthcare

2.8%
7.7%

Utilities

2.1%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
1.7%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.5%

Technology

SCHE
30.8%
SCHG
46.3%

Financial Services

SCHE
13.6%
SCHG
6.7%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHE
8.9%
SCHG
12.7%

Communication Services

SCHE
5.2%
SCHG
16.0%

Industrials

SCHE
4.9%
SCHG
5.8%

Basic Materials

SCHE
3.9%
SCHG
1.4%

Energy

SCHE
3.1%
SCHG
0.8%

Healthcare

SCHE
2.8%
SCHG
7.7%

Utilities

SCHE
2.1%
SCHG
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

SCHE
2.0%
SCHG
1.7%

Real Estate

SCHE
1.0%
SCHG
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHE vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHE vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHESCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.25

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.34

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

4.47

+3.07

SCHE vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHE and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHESCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.39

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.67

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.85

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.83

-0.60

Drawdowns

SCHE vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHESCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-34.59%

-1.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-16.41%

+5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-23.39%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.37%

-34.59%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-34.59%

-1.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.46%

-4.39%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.59%

-5.20%

-7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

4.91%

-1.77%

Volatility

SCHE vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.53%. This indicates that SCHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHESCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.53%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

12.02%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.76%

15.79%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

22.30%

-4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

21.57%

-2.07%

SCHE vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHE vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.68%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHE and SCHG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHE has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to SCHG (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

On 10-year performance, SCHG leads with 18.38% vs 8.21% for SCHE. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 18.38% return vs 8.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for SCHE.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.37% for SCHG.

SCHE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.04% for SCHG.

SCHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHE and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer