PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHE vs. EEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHE vs. EEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than EEM's 23.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHE has underperformed EEM with an annualized return of 8.96%, while EEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.87% annualized return.


SCHE

1D
-3.06%
1M
0.98%
YTD
10.23%
6M
10.33%
1Y
26.99%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
4.91%
10Y*
8.96%

EEM

1D
-5.67%
1M
2.49%
YTD
23.41%
6M
24.32%
1Y
46.62%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
6.54%
10Y*
9.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHE vs. EEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.23%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
23.41%33.98%6.49%8.95%-20.56%-3.63%17.02%18.22%-15.31%37.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHE and EEM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.98

The correlation between SCHE and EEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHE vs. EEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHE
EEM

Technology

33.7%
46.4%

Financial Services

20.0%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%
5.7%

Communication Services

7.1%
5.6%

Industrials

6.7%
5.9%

Energy

4.4%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.2%
2.3%

Utilities

2.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.9%

Technology

SCHE
33.7%
EEM
46.4%

Financial Services

SCHE
20.0%
EEM
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHE
9.6%
EEM
7.2%

Basic Materials

SCHE
7.5%
EEM
5.7%

Communication Services

SCHE
7.1%
EEM
5.6%

Industrials

SCHE
6.7%
EEM
5.9%

Energy

SCHE
4.4%
EEM
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHE
3.4%
EEM
2.4%

Healthcare

SCHE
3.2%
EEM
2.3%

Utilities

SCHE
2.8%
EEM
1.8%

Real Estate

SCHE
1.6%
EEM
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHE vs. EEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

EEM
EEM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
EEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHE vs. EEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHEEEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

3.46

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.46

12.70

-4.24

SCHE vs. EEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the EEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHE and EEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHE vs. EEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum EEM drawdown of -66.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and EEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHEEEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-66.43%

+30.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-13.52%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-17.29%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.31%

-37.49%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-39.82%

+3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-5.67%

+2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.56%

-15.99%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

3.68%

-0.48%

Volatility

SCHE vs. EEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) is 7.54%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) has a volatility of 12.59%. This indicates that SCHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHEEEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

12.59%

-5.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.01%

20.73%

-5.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

22.77%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.89%

19.55%

-1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.45%

20.67%

-1.22%

SCHE vs. EEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than EEM's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHE vs. EEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than EEM's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
1.66%2.22%2.43%2.63%2.50%1.99%1.45%2.76%2.24%1.89%1.89%2.49%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.61%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, SCHE and EEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

EEM has higher volatility (12.59%) compared to SCHE (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs EEM's -66.43%.

On 10-year performance, EEM leads with 9.87% vs 8.96% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, SCHE has been the lower-risk option at 7.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEM has performed better with a 9.87% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.72% for EEM.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.66% for EEM.

SCHE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEM is Emerging Markets Diversified. SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while EEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.72% for EEM.

EEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHE and EEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer