PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHE vs. FNDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHE vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHE achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHE has underperformed FNDA with an annualized return of 9.02%, while FNDA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


SCHE

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
10.50%
6M
12.18%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
9.02%

FNDA

1D
0.95%
1M
5.44%
YTD
18.31%
6M
15.70%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHE vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
10.50%26.54%10.60%8.93%-17.84%-0.65%14.49%20.31%-13.57%32.70%
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
18.31%7.44%9.00%20.29%-14.83%31.12%8.44%24.34%-12.12%12.68%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHE and FNDA is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.61

The correlation between SCHE and FNDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHE vs. FNDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHE
FNDA

Technology

32.1%
14.9%

Financial Services

13.7%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
12.2%

Communication Services

5.2%
4.1%

Industrials

4.8%
18.9%

Basic Materials

3.7%
5.2%

Energy

3.1%
6.2%

Healthcare

2.7%
6.8%

Utilities

2.1%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.0%
9.9%

Technology

SCHE
32.1%
FNDA
14.9%

Financial Services

SCHE
13.7%
FNDA
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHE
8.7%
FNDA
12.2%

Communication Services

SCHE
5.2%
FNDA
4.1%

Industrials

SCHE
4.8%
FNDA
18.9%

Basic Materials

SCHE
3.7%
FNDA
5.2%

Energy

SCHE
3.1%
FNDA
6.2%

Healthcare

SCHE
2.7%
FNDA
6.8%

Utilities

SCHE
2.1%
FNDA
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHE
2.0%
FNDA
4.2%

Real Estate

SCHE
1.0%
FNDA
9.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHE vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHE
SCHE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SCHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDA
FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHE vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHEFNDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

3.54

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.70

11.47

-3.78

SCHE vs. FNDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHE Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the FNDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHE and FNDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHE vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHE drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum FNDA drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHE and FNDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHEFNDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-44.64%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.29%

-9.36%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.08%

-25.92%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.35%

-25.92%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-44.64%

+8.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.66%

0.00%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.58%

-6.68%

-5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

2.89%

+0.31%

Volatility

SCHE vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF (SCHE) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) at 5.14%. This indicates that SCHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHEFNDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

5.14%

+1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.48%

12.13%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

17.40%

-0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

20.93%

-3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.49%

22.39%

-2.90%

SCHE vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHE has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHE vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison

SCHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than FNDA's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDA
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF
1.06%1.22%1.53%1.37%1.38%1.15%1.31%1.38%1.64%1.30%1.18%1.33%
SCHE
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.61%2.88%3.03%3.83%2.88%2.86%2.09%3.27%2.64%2.31%2.27%2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHE and FNDA have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHE has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to FNDA (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHE dropped -36.20% vs FNDA's -44.64%.

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 11.35% vs 9.02% for SCHE. On fees, SCHE is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHE is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

SCHE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.06% for FNDA.

SCHE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while FNDA is Small Cap Blend Equities. SCHE tracks FTSE Emerging Index, while FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHE and 0.25% for FNDA.

FNDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHE and FNDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer