PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHD vs. VOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHD vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHD achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than VOT's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHD has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 12.65%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.95% annualized return.


SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%

VOT

1D
0.12%
1M
1.80%
YTD
5.49%
6M
3.73%
1Y
7.75%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
6.19%
10Y*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHD vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
5.49%10.72%16.38%23.10%-28.87%20.50%34.50%33.76%-5.56%21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHD and VOT is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between SCHD and VOT has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SCHD vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHD
VOT

Consumer Defensive

19.2%
0.8%

Healthcare

18.8%
9.3%

Technology

16.4%
28.9%

Energy

16.2%
2.7%

Financial Services

9.3%
6.8%

Industrials

7.5%
23.7%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
13.9%

Basic Materials

1.2%
1.8%

Utilities

0.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

-

4.8%

Consumer Defensive

SCHD
19.2%
VOT
0.8%

Healthcare

SCHD
18.8%
VOT
9.3%

Technology

SCHD
16.4%
VOT
28.9%

Energy

SCHD
16.2%
VOT
2.7%

Financial Services

SCHD
9.3%
VOT
6.8%

Industrials

SCHD
7.5%
VOT
23.7%

Communication Services

SCHD
6.3%
VOT
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHD
6.3%
VOT
13.9%

Basic Materials

SCHD
1.2%
VOT
1.8%

Utilities

SCHD
0.0%
VOT
3.5%

Real Estate

SCHD

-

VOT
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHD vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VOT
VOT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHD vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCHDVOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.09

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.74

0.49

+5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.06

1.46

+12.60

SCHD vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHD Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHD and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCHDVOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

0.48

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.29

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.57

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.44

+0.41

Drawdowns

SCHD vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHD drawdown since its inception was -33.37%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHD and VOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHDVOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.37%

-60.16%

+26.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-15.96%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.13%

-21.77%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.85%

-37.19%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

-37.19%

+3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

-3.48%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.32%

-9.96%

+6.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

5.33%

-3.45%

Volatility

SCHD vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is 2.83%, while Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that SCHD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHDVOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

5.45%

-2.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.60%

12.85%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

16.20%

-5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

21.41%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

21.02%

-4.30%

SCHD vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHD has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHD vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than VOT's 0.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
VOT
Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF
0.63%0.64%0.67%0.71%0.78%0.34%0.56%0.78%0.84%0.72%0.81%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHD and VOT have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOT has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHD dropped -33.37% vs VOT's -60.16%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 11.95% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 11.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.63% for VOT.

SCHD is categorized as Dividend, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, while VOT tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for SCHD and 0.05% for VOT.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHD and VOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer