PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. SPEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. SPEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPEM's 11.32% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed SPEM with an annualized return of 8.48%, while SPEM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.63% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.25%
6M
11.25%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
8.48%

SPEM

1D
0.87%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
11.32%
6M
13.11%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
5.60%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. SPEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
9.25%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
11.32%25.63%11.40%10.51%-17.90%1.51%14.55%19.69%-13.26%34.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and SPEM is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.79

The correlation between SCHC and SPEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. SPEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
SPEM

Industrials

22.4%
8.5%

Basic Materials

13.7%
8.2%

Financial Services

12.6%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
10.4%

Technology

9.2%
28.2%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.9%

Energy

6.5%
4.7%

Healthcare

6.5%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
3.9%

Communication Services

3.2%
7.2%

Utilities

3.2%
2.8%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
SPEM
8.5%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
SPEM
8.2%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
SPEM
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
SPEM
10.4%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
SPEM
28.2%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
SPEM
1.9%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
SPEM
4.7%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
SPEM
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
SPEM
3.9%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
SPEM
7.2%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
SPEM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. SPEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPEM
SPEM Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPEM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPEM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. SPEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCSPEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.28

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

8.16

-1.04

SCHC vs. SPEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SPEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and SPEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. SPEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum SPEM drawdown of -64.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and SPEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCSPEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-64.41%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.36%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-17.62%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-31.75%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-36.06%

-7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-2.40%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-14.73%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

3.17%

+0.21%

Volatility

SCHC vs. SPEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) is 6.31%, while SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that SCHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCSPEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

6.87%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

14.21%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

16.67%

-0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

17.26%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

18.83%

-0.81%

SCHC vs. SPEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SCHC and SPEM have an expense ratio of 0.11%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SCHC vs. SPEM - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than SPEM's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.35%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%
SPEM
SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
2.49%2.77%2.78%2.80%3.38%3.14%1.92%2.94%2.34%1.12%1.51%2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and SPEM have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPEM has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to SCHC (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs SPEM's -64.41%.

On 10-year performance, SPEM leads with 9.63% vs 8.48% for SCHC. Both ETFs have the same 0.11% expense ratio. On volatility, SCHC has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPEM has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC and SPEM have the same expense ratio: 0.11% per year.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.49% for SPEM.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SPEM is Emerging Markets Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while SPEM tracks S&P Emerging Markets BMI. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and State Street.

SPEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and SPEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer