PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCHC vs. PRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SCHC vs. PRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than PRF's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has underperformed PRF with an annualized return of 8.48%, while PRF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.91% annualized return.


SCHC

1D
0.71%
1M
-2.18%
YTD
9.25%
6M
11.25%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
17.06%
5Y*
6.10%
10Y*
8.48%

PRF

1D
0.88%
1M
2.68%
YTD
15.65%
6M
15.18%
1Y
32.18%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
13.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCHC vs. PRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
9.25%37.59%1.97%14.36%-21.74%12.02%10.48%23.10%-18.60%29.42%
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
15.65%18.33%16.73%15.72%-7.79%31.12%7.78%27.42%-8.71%16.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SCHC and PRF is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010

0.78

The correlation between SCHC and PRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SCHC vs. PRF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SCHC
PRF

Industrials

22.4%
9.2%

Basic Materials

13.7%
3.4%

Financial Services

12.6%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.1%

Technology

9.2%
20.9%

Real Estate

8.6%
2.5%

Energy

6.5%
8.2%

Healthcare

6.5%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
6.3%

Communication Services

3.2%
10.2%

Utilities

3.2%
3.1%

Industrials

SCHC
22.4%
PRF
9.2%

Basic Materials

SCHC
13.7%
PRF
3.4%

Financial Services

SCHC
12.6%
PRF
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SCHC
10.0%
PRF
9.1%

Technology

SCHC
9.2%
PRF
20.9%

Real Estate

SCHC
8.6%
PRF
2.5%

Energy

SCHC
6.5%
PRF
8.2%

Healthcare

SCHC
6.5%
PRF
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

SCHC
4.1%
PRF
6.3%

Communication Services

SCHC
3.2%
PRF
10.2%

Utilities

SCHC
3.2%
PRF
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCHC vs. PRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHC
SCHC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SCHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHC Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

PRF
PRF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCHC vs. PRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SCHCPRFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.54

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

4.90

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

20.07

-12.95

SCHC vs. PRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the PRF Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCHC and PRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SCHC vs. PRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, smaller than the maximum PRF drawdown of -60.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and PRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCHCPRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.94%

-60.35%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-6.59%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-15.82%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.48%

-19.72%

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.94%

-38.16%

-5.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.49%

-0.00%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-6.92%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

1.61%

+1.77%

Volatility

SCHC vs. PRF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) at 3.60%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCHCPRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

3.60%

+2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

8.17%

+5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

10.95%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

15.23%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.02%

17.68%

+0.34%

SCHC vs. PRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

SCHC has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PRF's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SCHC vs. PRF - Dividend Comparison

SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than PRF's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRF
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF
1.37%1.59%1.78%1.84%2.01%1.58%1.97%1.99%2.25%1.58%2.17%2.25%
SCHC
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF
3.35%3.66%3.72%2.94%1.78%3.02%1.62%3.23%2.51%2.73%2.01%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


SCHC and PRF have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to PRF (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs PRF's -60.35%.

On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 13.91% vs 8.48% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, PRF has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 13.91% return vs 8.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.

SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 1.37% for PRF.

SCHC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PRF is Large Cap Value Equities. SCHC tracks FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for SCHC and 0.34% for PRF.

PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCHC and PRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer