PRF vs. SCHD
PRF (Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRF returned 14.01%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRF charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
PRF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 15.07% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PRF has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 14.01%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.68% annualized return.
PRF
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 15.07%
- 6M
- 14.51%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 13.06%
- 10Y*
- 14.01%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- YTD
- 17.24%
- 6M
- 16.44%
- 1Y
- 24.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
PRF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 15.07% | 18.33% | 16.73% | 15.72% | -7.79% | 31.12% | 7.78% | 27.42% | -8.71% | 16.01% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.24% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and SCHD is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.91 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRF and SCHD has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PRF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRF
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
PRF
SCHD
Financial Services
PRF
SCHD
Healthcare
PRF
SCHD
Communication Services
PRF
SCHD
Industrials
PRF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
PRF
SCHD
Energy
PRF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
PRF
SCHD
Basic Materials
PRF
SCHD
Utilities
PRF
SCHD
Real Estate
PRF
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
PRF
SCHD
PRF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.39 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.96 | 5.24 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.23 | 12.71 | +7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.35% | -33.37% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -4.61% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.82% | -16.13% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.72% | -16.85% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.16% | -33.37% | -4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.18% | -2.86% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -3.31% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.61% | 1.90% | -0.29% |
Volatility
PRF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 3.58% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 7.74% | +0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 11.09% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.20% | 14.36% | +0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 16.73% | +0.96% |
PRF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.38% | 1.59% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRF has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRF dropped -60.35% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, PRF leads with 14.01% vs 12.68% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRF has performed better with a 14.01% return vs 12.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for PRF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.38% for PRF.
PRF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. PRF tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for PRF and 0.06% for SCHD.
PRF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer