PRF vs. RSP
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP).
PRF and RSP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index. It was launched on Dec 19, 2005. RSP is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Apr 30, 2003. Both PRF and RSP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRF or RSP.
Performance
PRF vs. RSP - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRF achieves a 21.29% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 18.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRF having a 10.90% annualized return and RSP not far behind at 10.53%.
PRF
21.29%
2.81%
12.55%
29.30%
13.67%
10.90%
RSP
18.07%
2.55%
12.56%
27.69%
12.44%
10.53%
Key characteristics
| PRF | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.72 | 2.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.76 | 3.42 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.50 | 1.44 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.08 | 3.58 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.75 | 14.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.68% | 1.99% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.99% | 11.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -60.35% | -59.92% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.35% | -0.51% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRF vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRF has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PRF and RSP is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRF vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) and Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRF vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison
PRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than RSP's 1.44% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRF Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 2.01% | 1.58% | 1.97% | 1.99% | 2.25% | 1.58% | 2.17% | 2.25% | 1.73% | 1.56% |
RSP Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF | 1.44% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.28% | 1.64% | 1.69% | 2.02% | 1.52% | 1.20% | 1.70% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
PRF vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRF drawdown since its inception was -60.35%, roughly equal to the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRF and RSP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRF vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison
Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 ETF (PRF) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.63%. This indicates that PRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.