SCHC vs. MDLZ
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, SCHC returned 8.48%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, SCHC has outperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 8.48%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.09% annualized return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 23.10% | -18.60% | 29.42% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and MDLZ is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2010 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SCHC and MDLZ has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
MDLZ
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.98 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | -0.17 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -0.30 | +7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, roughly equal to the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -42.52% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -25.93% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -29.00% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | -29.14% | -7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | -29.74% | -14.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -12.59% | +9.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -11.03% | +0.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 14.70% | -11.32% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) at 5.46%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.46% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 16.28% | -2.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 22.26% | -6.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 19.52% | -1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 21.03% | -3.01% |
Dividends
SCHC vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHC and MDLZ have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to MDLZ (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer