SCHC vs. BXSL
SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Custom Developed Small Cap ex-US Liquid Net of Tax (Lux), while BXSL (Blackstone Secured Lending Fund) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, SCHC returned 17.06%/yr vs 7.49%/yr for BXSL. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SCHC vs. BXSL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SCHC achieves a 9.25% return, which is significantly higher than BXSL's -6.39% return.
SCHC
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 9.25%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- 1Y
- 25.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
BXSL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- -6.39%
- 6M
- -9.95%
- 1Y
- -15.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC vs. BXSL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.25% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | -2.39% |
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | -6.39% | -9.36% | 29.02% | 37.82% | -26.03% | 32.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between SCHC and BXSL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SCHC vs. BXSL — Risk / Return Rank
SCHC
BXSL
SCHC vs. BXSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SCHC | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.88 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | -0.68 | +2.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | -1.01 | +8.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SCHC vs. BXSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SCHC drawdown since its inception was -43.94%, which is greater than BXSL's maximum drawdown of -36.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCHC and BXSL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SCHC | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.94% | -36.80% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.48% | -23.47% | +10.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -24.21% | +8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.48% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -20.54% | +17.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.04% | -14.15% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 15.73% | -12.35% |
Volatility
SCHC vs. BXSL - Volatility Comparison
Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL) at 5.42%. This indicates that SCHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BXSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SCHC | BXSL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.31% | 5.42% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.88% | 16.42% | -2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 20.20% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 23.85% | -6.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.02% | 23.85% | -5.83% |
Dividends
SCHC vs. BXSL - Dividend Comparison
SCHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than BXSL's 12.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BXSL Blackstone Secured Lending Fund | 12.91% | 11.70% | 9.53% | 10.64% | 13.02% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.35% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SCHC and BXSL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHC has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to BXSL (5.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCHC dropped -43.94% vs BXSL's -36.80%.
SCHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SCHC and BXSL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer